How technology has affected you as a translator Essay

How technology has affected you as a translator - Essay Example The work can easily be sent and received across the cultural and natural borders. The translator may work for its clients from anywhere in the world. The market for the translator is not just limited to their own city or country. However translation is still considered to be a service whose dependence is based on high degree of trust between the translators and their clients. The translator may receive his high pay work mostly from the unseen clients living across the borders, as fees paid to the translators in different countries may vary, however the translators still believe that the best clients are made face to face. Technology has made the distribution of the large translation jobs quite easy between the intermediaries. Suppose if the client wants to market its product in 15 other languages, they would simply hire a marketing company. It is the job of the marketing firm to hire different brokers who then assign this job to a number of translation companies that further allocate the task to the translators that are often are freelancers. In such a case the company is usually paying at least three times more of what the freelance translator receives. However if the company directly assign the task to any freelancer then it be an advantage for the company as well as the freelance translator, as the company will be paying less for the same job and the translator will be receiving more. Technology has played a significant role in increasing the benefits for the translators; however the various consequences of the electronic communication have also increased the security risk. Translators are usually working on the material that is out of the public domain. This is what makes trust such an important factor in this business. Therefore while sending and receiving a file the translator must be aware of secure FTP, various forms of zipping and of encoding. There is no

Explaining Prophets And Their Duties Religion Essay

Explaining Prophets And Their Duties Religion Essay From a Biblical perspective, a prophet is a spokesperson on earth who proclaims Gods word, revealing things that would happen in the future. This utterance is called prophecy because its divinely inspired, and involves, revelation or interpretation. This essay will illustrate a study on prophecy in the Old Testament (OT), various people who met the criteria of being true prophets and identify those who were known to be false prophets. Further, an insight on different kinds of prophecy and there fulfilment will also be demonstrated. Prophets through various scriptures in the bible were referred to as men of God or servants of God to implicate the seriousness of their status. After the fall of man, God had a divine plan to restore His love relationship with humans and this was portrayed throughout the OT. Tholuck titled the prophets as the ancient preachers of the Church, he said, The prophets were the living depositaries of the idea of the theocracy or kingdom of God. In other words prophecy erected from the foundation of Gods law and it was the prophets who imposed it. According to the prophetic criteria, bible theologians state that Enoch (Gen. 5: 24) and Noah (Gen. 6: 9) qualified as prophets, because God spoke through them, but it was Abraham whom God first spoke of as a prophet when He warned King Abimelech against marrying Sarah (Gen. 20: 6-7). According to Bible theology, God chose the Israelites to be His representatives on earth to whom He could reveal Himself, by speaking through His chosen advocates known as the prophets so that all other nations could be blessed and know the true Living God. He wanted humans to know that He was their creator and He had divine plans and a purpose for them to live according to His will. He gave them His laws to which they were to live by, and He was to be their God. It was those laws that caused conflict between God and His people. Chris Wright believed that it was the Holy Spirit who inspired the prophets. He said, He is the Spirit who spoke through the prophets, inspiring their commitment to speak the truth and to stand for justice. This was affirmed by Peter in The New Testament when he contested the origin of the OT prophecies (2 Pet. 1: 20-21), and was evident when Saul got anointed as king and the Spirit of God took control of Him and he prophesied (1Sam. 10: 10). Since prophets were the mediators of God, they only spoke in the name of God, lived by faith and demonstrated the holiness of God, as Zechariah father of John the Baptist said in his prophecy that, As He said through His holy prophets of long ago (Luke 1: 70). The prophets had to be fully obedient to what God required of them hoping in Gods Spirit that strengthened and worked through them. Fulfilment was a key issue in the prophetic movement. Through Isaiah, God said, As the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish, so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater, so is my word that goes out from my mouth: It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it. (Isa. 55: 10-11). Such prophecy took away any doubt about Gods will especially to the prophets themselves, who prophesied to a doubtful nation. One writer said, The criterion of true prophecy is what it should be-truth, the correspondence between the prophetic word and the realities of history. Any prophet who spoke oracles of other gods other than the God of Israel would be known as a false prophet. So the prophets main role was to co mmunicate Gods message in its fullness. Since it was Gods divine plan to use prophets to convey His messages, He illustrated that He purposely set them apart, He said, Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations. (Jer. 28: 5). Prophets were from diverse back grounds, for example Amos was a shepherd (Amos 1:1), Elijah was a priest and Elisha was a herdsman (19:15-21). Although men were popularly used, women like Miriam; sister to Moses (Micah 6: 4); Deborah who served as an Israelite judge (Judges 4: 4); Huldah (2 Kings 22:14) and Noadiah (Neh. 6: 14) also served as prophets. God revealed Himself and communicated to His prophets through visions and dreams or spoke audibly to them as in the case of Moses. He said, Listen to my words: When there is a prophet among you, I, the LORD, reveal myself to them in visions, I speak to them in dreams (Num. 12: 6). So this is why prophets had common characteristics that identified them as Gods messengers. Their messages exposed the nature and attributes of God to men (Deut. 5:4-10); made known to men the laws of God (Ex 20: 1-17); to call the people back in obedience to Gods laws (2Chr 24:19); exhorted the people to sincerity in worship (Jer. 7:1-11); warned the Israeli tes of Divine judgment upon sin, both personal and national and foretold future events which God had willed especially the coming of the Messiah (Isaiah 9:6). According to the O.T, there are three sections of books which are refered to as prophetic books and they are known as; (Joshua to Kings) the former prophets, major prophetic books (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel), and finally the Minor Prophets (Hosea to Malachi). The prophetic ministry in the O.T intensified at the beginning of the Exodus when God appointed Moses and Aaron as His prophets with a mission to rescue and lead His people out of slavery from the land of Egypt after 430 years. God gave a specific oracle to Moses that His chosen people were being called to worship him. The prophetic movement appeared throughout The Exodus 1446 BCE and the period of the Israelites captivity by the Assyrians and Babylonians, to the times of Zechariah who was associated with the restoration of the temple in 521-515 BCE. There is a mention of many false prophets in the O.T. God clearly warned the Israelites never to approve of such prophets, and he would test them to see if they would remain faithfully (Deut. 13: 1-5). It was a warning that was repeatedly issued with an example of Hananiah a false prophet in Judah in the reign of King Zedekiah. (Jer. 28: 1-17). God even approved of the death of such prophets when He said, But if any prophet presumes to speak anything in my name that I have not authorised him to speak, or speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet must die (Deut. 18: 20). Prophet Elijah also challenged Jezebels prophets of Baal to show that he was serving A Living God, unlike all other gods that were worshiped in the land. He killed 450 false prophets from that confrontation (1 Kg. 18: 19-40). Prophets could also be manipulated or bribed to defy God, as in the case of King Balak of Moab who asked Balaam to curse the Israelites. Now come and put a curse on these people, because they are too powerful for me. Perhaps then I will be able to defeat them and drive them out of the country. For I know that those you bless are blessed, and those you curse are cursed (Num. 22:6). Balaams response indicated that he communicated with God (Num. 22: 9-41). God revealed that He could use anything to prophecy as was in the case of Balaams donkey (Num. 22: 28). Another aspect of prophetic experience, involved the prophet himself who performed portents to support the prophecy e.g. Isaiah walked naked for 3 years in the land (Isa. 20:2); Hosea expressed the prophecy by being obedient to what God told him. Go and marry a prostitute so that some of her children will be conceived in prostitution. This will illustrate how Israel has acted like a prostitute by turning against the Lord and worship ing other gods. (Hos. 1: 2). Though Gods prophets differed on how they prophesied, the emphasis of their messages was common. It was about sin, judgement, wrath of God, repentance, love, mercy and forgiveness of a compassionate God. For example Moses was a law giver and urged the Israelites repeatedly never to take on the pagan practices of the people of the Promised Land because God Himself would raise another prophet like him to continue a prophets great role. (Deut. 18: 14-17). The Prophet Elijah was a spiritual revivalist, and Isaiahs prophecies were upon the royal house of Judah. Prophets suffered persecution, and they were often disregarded, despised and rejected especially by rebellious kings and people who had hardened hearts and continually disobeyed Gods law, But the people would not listen and continued to follow their former practices. (2 Kg. 17: 40). Ungers Bible dictionary quotes, The genius of Old Testament prophecy was rather, a prediction of the future arising from the conditions of the present and was inseparably connected with the profoundly religious and spiritual message the prophet was called to proclaim to his own generation. Some prophecies of the OT were Forth telling prophecies that called back people unto their God in terms of repentance and change, as in the case of Jonah when God relented and withdrew plans of disaster upon Nineveh (Jonah 2). Fore telling prophecies, gave the people time to obey, seek and pray honestly to God, a significantly important feature of Biblical prophecy. Such prophecies promised restoration and events that would be fulfilled in the future declaring salvation, especially those that announced the coming of a Messiah who would come at Gods appointed time, as the final perfect sacrifice to God who would redeem mankind and fulfil the reconciliation of God and man (Hos. 14; Amos 9: 11-15). Overall, Jesus was the completion of the prophetic scriptures in the OT. Jesus testified in His time that He was the reference point of the OT prophecies. I will proclaim the LORDs decree: He said to me, You are my son; today I have become your father. (Psalm 2:7). Bible Scholars, G and R Konig said, Jesus is unique among all people in history in that he is the fulfilment of centuries of Messianic prophecies, which are found in the Old Testament that foretold his place of birth, details of his life, his mission, his nature, his death, and his resurrection. From a theological perspective, God affirms both His power and right to judge, and His steadfastness in the end to save. Jeremiah prophesied of the new covenant, whereas Ezekiel had a vision of a new temple centre stage (Ezek. 40, 48). Isaiah is also memorable for its Messianic promises (Isa 9:2-7, 11:1-9), and ideas of new creation and Exodus. If Judgement and salvation are the fabric of the OT history, it explains why so much of it was the work of the prophets, because God expressed His heart through the prophets in order to restore His relationship with man. Prophecy is one of the major ways in which God communicates His will to mankind even up to this age as written: Then he turned to his disciples and said privately, Blessed are the eyes that see what you see. For I tell you that many prophets and kings wanted to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it. (Luke 10: 23-24). The prophetic movement was a significant phenomenon in history of Divine revelation. Therefore, without the prophecies in the Old Testament, humans wouldnt know of Gods intentions. This can only be summarised as Gods Divine love for mankind.

Three Honrable Pilgrims :: essays research papers

Three Honrable Pilgrims Geoffrey Chaucer was the greatest English poet of his time. Besides William Shakespeare no other writer has surpassed Chaucer's achievements. One of his best unfinished writing, "The Canterbury Tales" rankes as one of the world's best work of literature. In "The Prologue to the Canterbury Tales" Chaucer presents a cross-section of Medieval Society through his discriptions of people representing the court, the church and the common people. In Medieval Society, just like in modern day society, there were people of different moralities. The knight the Parson and the Plowmen are examples of good people who possessed honorable characteristics. The Knight in this pilgrimage is a representative from the Court class which was at the top of Medeval Society. He was wealthly but he didn't want to impress anybody. He truly had all the charactoristics of an ideal knight. As a Christian, he loved thruth and as gentlemen, he believed in chivalry and honor. With so many dishonest people going to Canterbury,or must have been very irritating to deal with them. But "He never yet a barrish thing had said. In all his life to any , come what might ; He was a true, a perfect gentle-knight." He was true to his king and was generous, and courteous. He didn't wear flashy clothes. All he wore was a coarse cloth shirt of cotton and linen. His shirt was stained with dark smudges where his amar had left it's marks . The Knight's motivation to go on this pilgramage is to give thanks to God, because he had survived all of the wars and battles he had fought in. Another honerable pilgrim on this trip was the Parson who is representative of church society. Un like the other religious people on the pilgrimage who claimed lots of earthly posessions, the Parson was a very poor priest. However he was a noble example to the people of his church. He was an honest priest who didn't cheat people out of their money. Although he was poor in money and possessions, he was vary rich in the Christian spirit. He would practice what he preached and would rather give then recive and "who truly knew christ's gospel and would preach it, Devoutly to parishioners,and teach it". When parishioners gave him money he would not accept it. As a follower of Christ he was willing to help his fellow man. The reason he is gtoing on this trip was to pay respect to the

Public Transportation Vs Private Transportation

Nowadays people from all over the world are suffering from the air pollution. One of the reasons of such situation is the constantly increasing car usage. Are we able to do something in order to encourage people not to use private cars or to use them less? To be honest, there are only several things we can do. Among them is propaganda of the risks caused by the private cars usage. We can provide people with the main benefits they can get by using public transport and make the transportation prices more affordable.First of all, advertisement is a very powerful â€Å"weapon†. Many people can remember the ad they saw several years ago. Advertisement has a very strong effect. It can impress people, influence their thoughts and even change them. Of course, it is impossible to encourage all people from all over the world to use public transport only. But still a certain number of people will definitely give up using cars and will give preferences to the public transport as time goes by.Moreover, we can also provide people with the benefits they can get from usage of public transport. For example, it is possible to provide those people who use public transport with the 20% discount when they need to buy something. Also, it is possible to implement special cards that will be some kinds of an opportunity to change bus to train for free. As a final point, let’s take a look at one more thing we can provide people with in order to encourage them to use public transport. It would be advisable to make the public transportation prices lower.Let’s suppose that you pay 40$ per month to drive your own car. If you give preference to the public transport, it will cost 20$ per month. What would you pick as the method of transportation? Sorry to say that it may be quite hard to set the price of 20$ for public transport, as transportation companies may be against such fee’s reduction. But if it happens one day, a great number of people would give up their cars and prefer public transport in order to prevent congestion and air pollution. I’m 100% sure that all the ways†¦ Public Transportation Vs Private Transportation Nowadays people from all over the world are suffering from the air pollution. One of the reasons of such situation is the constantly increasing car usage. Are we able to do something in order to encourage people not to use private cars or to use them less? To be honest, there are only several things we can do. Among them is propaganda of the risks caused by the private cars usage. We can provide people with the main benefits they can get by using public transport and make the transportation prices more affordable.First of all, advertisement is a very powerful â€Å"weapon†. Many people can remember the ad they saw several years ago. Advertisement has a very strong effect. It can impress people, influence their thoughts and even change them. Of course, it is impossible to encourage all people from all over the world to use public transport only. But still a certain number of people will definitely give up using cars and will give preferences to the public transport as time goes by.Moreover, we can also provide people with the benefits they can get from usage of public transport. For example, it is possible to provide those people who use public transport with the 20% discount when they need to buy something. Also, it is possible to implement special cards that will be some kinds of an opportunity to change bus to train for free. As a final point, let’s take a look at one more thing we can provide people with in order to encourage them to use public transport. It would be advisable to make the public transportation prices lower.Let’s suppose that you pay 40$ per month to drive your own car. If you give preference to the public transport, it will cost 20$ per month. What would you pick as the method of transportation? Sorry to say that it may be quite hard to set the price of 20$ for public transport, as transportation companies may be against such fee’s reduction. But if it happens one day, a great number of people would give up their cars and prefer public transport in order to prevent congestion and air pollution. I’m 100% sure that all the ways†¦

Franchise vs New Business Essay

Gaining profit is one of the reasons why most people do business. They buy stocks, start their own business, or the most popular now is franchising. However, due to some factors – economy and competition- it is somewhat risky to do so. Hence, in deciding, one should know the pros and cons of each. Deciding whether to invest money on franchise or start a new business requires knowing the different features one can get are worth the cost he/she has to pay for. This may seem to be a debatable issue that is why the organization JAM prepared a debate regarding this issue. There were two groups, each group had discussed and rebutted. It is your own idea (originality), you are the boss and you can implement basic management principles (planning, controlling, etc) are some of the reasons given by those who favor starting a new business. But, we noticed that the most of their answers were being repeated and not elaborated by providing specific examples. An example is the implementation of management principles. It would have been better if they have provided situations in which these can be used since these management principles can still be used in franchising. Furthermore, when they had rebutted the other group, we noticed that they just repeated what the other group had said without elaborating it further. Despite some weak points, there are some good things they had pointed out. They discussed that on starting a new business one can reap the fruit of its own labor. One has control with the business without the franchisors collecting fees. This may seem true since in franchising one cannot change the business. It is as it is. The group of franchising, on the other hand, pointed out that it is less risky since there is an existing business and a protective reputation from the franchisor. One good point that they had discussed was the advantages of franchise. They talked about the continuous support from management, advertising was not costly, and no required feasibility study. However, this strong point is somewhat their weak point for reason that they merely focused on discussing it without opposing the other side. The time was consumed explaining them. In a nutshell, we can say that it went good since we gained idea on the advantages and disadvantages of the two. This will help us a lot in the future on how best to use our money.

Gentlemans Agreement essays

Gentlemans Agreement essays Philip Greenwood is a magazine reporter that is offered a job in New York to publish a series on anti-Semitism. Greenwood is having a hard time finding an angle approaching the Hebrew religion. After several nights of no leads he decides to write his good friend from childhood and wants to ask, what is it like to be Jewish? Realizing just before he begins to type, there is no way of fully understanding what it feels like to be a minority unless he pretends to be Jewish himself. In order for him to make this project work few people know the truth about the new man that has arrived in New York City. Philip is a tall slender man with dark features such as his hair and eyes. He is able to pass as Jewish. What Greenwood doesnt realize is that it will effect his entire life style and the ones he loves. The project is under way, and he notices that with in one day word has spread throughout the entire magazine company that a new Jewish man has been assign an article to publish. Problem after problem start to occur after Philips little boy comes home from school confused on what religion he is. Greenwood explains to Tommy that in order to fully understand what it feels like to be Jewish he is acting as though he of the same religion. Philip has little problems along the way, until Dave is back from being over seas. Dave is the long time friend who faces the cruel world every day by being Jewish. Dave and Philip and another reporter go out on the town for a couple of drinks to talk about the old times. While Dave is sitting down in a chair, a rude man bumps in to him and asks his name. After hearing his last name the man was ready to fight. Philip had to step in between the two. He soon realized that anti-Semitism is no joke. Greenwoods project had been going along for about one month and he and his soon to be wife were having difficult times as well. P ...

Coursework piece 1 Essays

Coursework piece 1 Essays Coursework piece 1 Essay Coursework piece 1 Essay The candidate uses and develops relevant knowledge in a sustained account of the changes made at Ightham mote over time. The candidates cover the site fully and supports most claims effectively with evidence including annotated illustrations. Some awareness is shown of Ightham Mote as a historical source.Question 1 (9-10 level 4)As Level 3 and the candidates also makes reasonable judgements that show an understanding of the complexity of the site and its past. The candidate may comment on the pace and degree of change. The candidate will give a clear account of the changes and development using a wide range of evidence to support their claim. Answers will also give a clear assessment of the value of the site as a historical source.Question 2 (8-12)Candidates answer discuss a wide range of factors. Answers attempt to assess relative importance and support the points with evidenceQuestion 2 (13-15)Candidate will consider a wide range of factors (as level 3) a nd will reach a substantiated judgement about their relative importance. Answers will show awareness of different types of causes e.g. political, economic social and chance.Question 1Ightham Mote started off by having one front. Now when you look at this country house you can see many changes have been made. Probably the first thing you will notice is that the house has been expanded a lot, there are now four fronts. Many other interior changes have been made to the house.The Great HallThe Great Hall was built in the 1330s. It is known that the room was built in this time as ring tests have been taken out on wood found in the room on the ceilings.A large window was put into the opposite wall to the fireplace by the Haunt family. This window was then changed by Sir Richard Clement. Below is the window. I have explained the changes which have been made.The CryptThe Crypt is probably one of the oldest rooms in the house. It has been built under the Old chapel. It is the room in the hou se which has been changed the least. It has been lefty as it was in the beginning however it shows us what it was like in the times it was used.The Oriel roomThe Oriel room has changed quite a lot since it was first used. In 1330 it was a basic empty room with small window at the front. This was all changed. Windows were added and changed, fireplaces were added and so were separate levels.The Old Chapel and New ChapelThe Old chapel was used every day. It lies above the Crypt and was part of the original building. Only the men were allowed to sit in here during the service. In the room next door the woman sat of the service. There was a hole in the wall so that they could look through and see what was going on. This room had a fireplace inserted after quite a while. It was also changed into two separate rooms. This can be seen by the fact that there are holes halfway up the wall where the floorboards would have been originally. Also we know this because the windows have been changed. Originally there was only one set which went the full length, ceiling to floor however, now there are two sets of windows. One set on normal level and another set a lot further up.When Dame Dorothy moved into the house she moved the chapel into a different room which wasnt used as much. This was then named the New Chapel. She got permission to hold and hear sermons in her own home so that she could use the room. On the next page is a picture of the new chapel.The Drawing roomThis room was added at a later day. The room first came to use when Dame Dorothy owned the house. She felt there was nowhere for her to relax with guests so she changed this room. There have been several changes made to this room.The West frontThere have been quite a few changes to this front over the years. The Haunt family added this front to Ightham Mote in the 15th century. The lower part of the tower is thought to have been built between 1330 and 1340. Here is a picture of this front.Here is a close-up of west side where the drawing room is.The CourtyardThis is the centre of the house. When you first enter the house this is where you will find yourself. From here you can access all rooms on the bottom level. It has been made up by each of the sides of the house that have been added over the years.From looking at this house I have learnt several things. The house has been left as it was. Unfortunately we have little written evidence about the house and when alterations were made. However the house is very useful as the alterations that were made have not been covered up. Therefore we can see how things were made and when they were made/put into the house. We can therefore tell which owners made the changes. So we can try and work out reasons for why they may have made the alterations.The site gives us ideas about what the designs of houses were like over the period of time 1399 and 1889. If shows us how styles and ideas for building has changed. Also interior decorating can tell us ab out the time.Overall I think that the site is very useful and can tell us a lot about the history of the house. If the alterations had been covered up more then I do not think that the site would have been as useful to us. This is because then we couldnt see how it changed and made us realise why it may have been changed.Question 2As I have already explained there are many ways in which Ightham Mote has changed over the years. Many of the changes have been made for specific reasons. The different owners have made all the changes as they have moved into the house to make it their own. The Haunts were the first family to own Ightham Mote in the period of time 1399 to 1519. They ended up running out of money. They were executed for being to close to the king who reigned before the one who was on the throne at this time. The house was bought in 1521 by the Clement family. Sir Richard Clement owned the house until 1544. The final family I have looked at was the Selby family. They bought the house in 1591. The house finally left the Selby family in 1980 this family probably made the most changes to the house.There are probably two main reasons why all of these changes were made to this house. These are the main reasons however there may be other smaller reasons.Religion played a big part in the lives of people around in this period of time. It made many changes in how people lived. People liked to be associated with royalty as it gave them a higher status. This is one of the reasons we think that some of the changes were made to the house. To make them seem closer to royalty. Sir Richard Clement put in the large window with the symbols of the king, the queen and the Tudor rose. He also put in the ceiling in what is now the new chapel. It is thought that he did this because he was expecting the king to come and visit. This shows that people always wanted to impress royalty. The slightly odd thing about this house is that even after Henry VIII had divorced his wife an d had demanded that anything that was in honour of her was destroyed; the ceilings and windows were still left in the house.Status and wealthy ness also played a large part in peoples lives. People liked to show off. Nowadays people show wealth off by their cars and clothes. However, when this house was owned people showed off by their house. Decoration, size and additions to your house showed wealthy ness. This then showed status. The wealthier you were the higher status you were. This meant that people tried as hard as they could to have whatever was in fashion at the time for their house. An example of this is the Oriel window in the Oriel room. Sir Richard Clement bought this and installed it. At the time these types of window had a use however, Sir Richard Clement didnt buy it because of its use, he bought it because it showed wealthy ness. He also put in the gatehouse for decoration. There was no actual need for it however he wanted it to show off his wealthy ness. At a later date, another family added crenulations to the gatehouse. At the time that these were added they were generally put onto buildings as an aid of protection. However the family just put them on to show their wealthy ness and status. We know this because there are little shelters behind them which mean that there would be no room for people to stand behind them.Fashion also was quite important at the time. Changes were also made to the house because of fashion. For example the Oriel window was fashionable at the time. It was popular to have in houses. Therefore Sir Richard Clement bought one to put in because it showed wealthy ness and to keep in with what was in fashion.From this we can see that basically all anyone at the time wanted to do was impress people. Whether it was neighbours or royalty. This shows that people were quite shallow at the time. From the country houses we can tell a lot more than just what changes have been made. We can learn about why people did things and what people were actually like.